Ferrari v. Leonard et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHAD MARK FRANCO FERRARI,
Plaintiff,
v.
DETECTIVE DANIEL LEONARD, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 2:26-cv-01866
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2026, upon consideration of Defendant
Vincent Corrigan’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 33) and Plaintiff’s Memorandum of
Law in Opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 34), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Corrigan are DISMISSED with
prejudice.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Under Fed. R. Civ. P.
6(b)(1)(A) to Extend the Time to Amend as a Matter of Course Under Rule
15(a)(1)(B) (Dkt. No. 35) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
Gail A. Weilheimer, J.
Case 2:26-cv-01866-GAW Document 39 Filed 10/16/26 Page 1 of 1