3:23-cv-00343•Blount v. Whole Foods Market Downtown Nashville
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ALIVIA BLOUNT, Plaintiff, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:23-cv-00343 ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court rules as follows: 1. Whole Foods’s second objection to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 120) be denied (Doc. No. 172) is SUSTAINED; 2. Whole Foods’s remaining objections (Doc. No. 172) and Blount’s objections (Doc. No. 156) are OVERRULED AS MOOT; 3. The R&R (Doc. No. 155) is not accepted; 4. Whole Foods’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 120) is GRANTED; 5. Blount’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 125) and Whole Foods’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 154) are DENIED AS MOOT; 6. The upcoming pretrial conference, trial, and all related deadlines are CANCELLED; and 7. All other pending motions (Doc. Nos. 162–64, 66–69, 183–95, 202 and 213) are DENIED AS MOOT. Case 3:23-cv-00343 Document 217 Filed 11/21/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:23-cv-00343 Document 217 Filed 11/21/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.