Shedd v. Murfreesboro Social Security Office, 2836 Saint Patrick Court Murfreesboro, TN 37128

3:24-cv-00047Tnmd02.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
BRITTNEY SHEDD,
Plaintiff,
v.
MURFREESBORO SOCIAL
SECURITY OFFICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:24-cv-00047
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY
ORDER
Defendants twice moved to dismiss the case for failure to effect service of process. (See
Doc. Nos. 6 and 11). After the first motion, the Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff additional time
to effect service. (See Doc. No. 10). When Plaintiff failed to comply with the new deadline,
Defendant filed a second motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiff still has not served Defendant
and has not made any filings in the case since September 13, 2024. The Magistrate Judge now
recommends the motion to dismiss be granted and this case dismissed without prejudice under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 14). The Report and
Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings were
to be filed within fourteen days of service. No objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) and concludes that
it should be ADOPTED and APPROVED. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
It is so ORDERED.
_____________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:24-cv-00047 Document 15 Filed 01/02/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.