Potosky v. Core, LLC et al

1 / 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
MICHAEL POTOSKY, §
“Plaintiff,” §
§
v. §
§
Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00667
CORE, LLC D/B/A CORE MEDICINE and
BECHTEL CORPORATION,
“Defendants.”
§
§
§
ORDER
Before the Court is “Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion to Remand” (Dkt. No. 3) (“Motion to Remand”),
“Defendant Core, LLC’s Amended Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand” (Dkt. No.
10), and the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation Denying Motion to Remand” (Dkt. No.
12) (“R&R”). The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 3).
Dkt. No. 12 at 6.
Objections to the R&R were due October 7, 2026. No objections were filed. If there have been no
objections to the magistrate’s ruling, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions for clear error.
See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).
Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the
R&R (Dkt. No. 12) and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 3).
SIGNED this October 8, 2026
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
October 08, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 1:26-cv-00667 Document 13 Filed 10/08/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 1