Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Park Insurance Agency, Inc.

CourtListener 6582920Massappct08.12.1981

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Because count four of the plaintiff’s complaint was brought pursuant to G. L. c. 93A, § 11, there was no requirement of a thirty-day demand letter as required by G. L. c. 93A, § 9, Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 99-101 (1977), and the judge committed error in dismissing count four. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

So ordered.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.