January 9, 2020- State of New Mexico v. Christopher Cain, No. A-1-CA-37782

Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication
with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly
in Odyssey.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO	1
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,	2
Plaintiff-Appellee,	3
v. 	No. A-1-CA-37782	4
CHRISTOPHER CAIN,	5
Defendant-Appellant.	6
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY	7
Karen L. Townsend, District Court Judge	8
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General	9
Albuquerque, NM	10
for Appellee	11
L. Helen Bennett	12
Albuquerque, NM	13
for Appellant	14
MEMORANDUM OPINION	15
VANZI, Judge.	16
{1} 	Defendant appeals from the district court’s orders revoking his probation and	17
denying 	his 	motion 	for 	reconsideration. 	In 	this 	Court’s 	notice 	of 	proposed	18
disposition, we proposed to summarily affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in	19
opposition conceding that, in light of the well-established standard of review and	20
limited scope of review, and notwithstanding the significant additional legal research	21
undertaken by appellate counsel and issues that may be asserted in other legal	22
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 1/9/2020 1:12 PM

2
proceedings such as habeas, there is no arguable error or issue to be asserted in this	1
appeal that could result in a disposition more favorable to Defendant. Accordingly,	2
for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition and herein, we affirm.	3
{2} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.	4
______________________________	5
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge	6
WE CONCUR:	7
________________________________	8
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge	9
_________________________________	10
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge	11