March 31, 2020- Mary Torrez v. David Sanchez, No. A-1-CA-37602

A-1-CA-37602Nmctapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court’s discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with
NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in
Odyssey.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO	1
MARY TORREZ,	2
Plaintiff-Appellee,	3
v. 	NO. A-1-CA-37602	4
DAVID SANCHEZ,	5
Defendant-Appellant.	6
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RIO ARRIBA COUNTY	7
Matthew J. Wilson, District Judge	8
The Simons Firm, LLP	9
Quinn Scott Simons	10
Santa Fe, NM	11
for Appellee	12
David Sanchez	13
Chama, NM	14
Pro Se Appellant	15
MEMORANDUM OPINION	16
VARGAS, Judge.	17
{1} 	Defendant David Sanchez appeals following the district court’s final order	18
granting Plaintiff injunctive relief and creating a prescriptive easement. [RP 236-37]	19
This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily affirm,	20
having reviewed Defendant’s arguments in his docketing statement. In response,	21
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 3/31/2020 11:15 AM
2
Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition.	1
However, Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition to our proposed	2
disposition, and the time for doing so has expired.	3
{2} 	Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning contained in our notice of proposed	4
disposition and affirm the district court.	5
{3} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.	6
__________________________________	7
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge	8
WE CONCUR:	9
_________________________________	10
BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge	11
_________________________________	12
ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge	13

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.