334 Or 491 ; 334 Or 492•Petitions for review, August 6 and 13, 2002
Gesamter Gesetzestext
491 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (52 P8d 1056, 1057) August 6, 2002 Upon consideration by the court. In the two cases listed below, the peti- tion for review is allowed. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further pro- ceedings in light of State v. Barnum, 888 Or 297, 89 P8d 178 (2002). State v. Lucio-Camargo, Leopoldo Celos (A104767)(S48440)(172 Or App 298) State v. McCloud, Patrick K. (All2227)(S49499)(177 Or App 511) ALLOWED August 6, 2002 State v. Trax, Craig Donald (A105215/16)(S49484)( 179 Or App 193) August 18, 2002 Statev. Collins, Lawrence D. (A108615)(S49524)(1790r App 384) State v. Dumont, Melvira (A107080)(S49419)(177 Or App 650) State v. Snow, Coy Randell (A110840)(S49504)(179 Or App 222) Washington County Police Officers' Association v. Washington County (A114208) (849518)(181 Or App 448) DENIED August 6, 2002 AT&T Communications of the Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of Eugene (A105861)(849258)(177 Or App 379) Dillard and Dillard (Al 10428)(S49445)(179 Or App 24) Hammond, Robert V. v. Palmateer (A109257)(849588)(178 Or App 536) Meriweather, Thomas Nicholas, Jr. v. Morrow (A109678)(S49439 )(180 Or App 393) Meriweather, Thomas Nicholas v. Baldwin (A101317)(S49576)(1800r App 393) Pasqual-Lucas, Francisco v. Hill (A112979)(849547)(180 Or App 392) Portland Fire Fighters' Association, Local 43 v. City of Portland (A111627) (849509)(181 Or App 85) Roth, Jerome Karl v. Johnson (A100328)(S49470)(1800r App 611) Smith v. Washington County (A106905)(S49482)(180 Or App 505) Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of Eugene (A106774)(S49252)(177 Or App 417) State ex rel Department of Human Services v. Gandy (A116748/49)(S49561)(181 OrApp662) State ex rel Palacios v. Rea (A109434)(S49446)(179 Or App 431) Statev. Bell, Larry Lydell, Sr. (A111069)(S49520)(181 Or App 456) State v. Bletson, Harrison Lee (A105176)(S49511)(181 Or App 126) State v. Bourne, Calvin Cecil (A109871)(S49550)(179 Or App 743) Statev. Bush, Dale Allen (A106479)(S48692)(1740r App 280) State v. Engstrom, Stanley Richard (A110058)(S49559)(181 Or App 127) State v. Fzeo, Kimberlee Ann (A110689)(S49551)(177 Or App 330) State v. Kelso, James Edgar (Al 11680/8 l)(S49533)(1790r App 552) State v. Lewis, Wesley James (A106709)(S49481)(1800r App 613) Statev. Nealeigh, Robert Dean (A111276)(S49514)(1810r App 127) State v. Parham, Billy James (Al12125/26)(S49502)(180 Or App 206) State v. Shewell, Jared Clark (A107567)(S49549)(1780r App 115)
492 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW-Continued (52 P3d 1057) State v. Taylor, Rodney Dean (Al11068)(S49527)(180 Or App 394) Taylor, Dewayne v. Lampert (Al12575l(S49540)(180 Or App 393) TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc. v. City of Eugene (A105860)(S49251)(177 Or App 433) Thunderbird, Kenneth v. Lampert (A112595)(S49453)(1800r App 613) White, Lydell v. Palmateer (A109315)(S49507)(181 Or App 126) August 18, 2002 Blandino and Mcilvaine v. Fischel (A108548)(S494 74)(179 Or App 185) Culver, Reed Allan v. Hill (A110279)(S49585)(180 Or App 612) Dahlen v. Oregon Transfer Company (A90334)(S49477)(1800r App 599) GTE Northwest Incorporated v. Oregon Public Utility Commission (A106560) (S49351)(179 Or App 46) Koppenstein v. Appraiser Certification and Licensing Board (A115719)(S49534) (182 Or App 149) Macy v. SAIF Corporation (A114516)(S49583)(181 Or App 663) Rogers Machinery, Inc. v. Washington County (A104615)(S49535)(181 Or App 369) State ex rel State Office for Services to Children and Families v. Willis (A115938)(S49616)(1800r App 613) State v. Armstrong, Elliott John (Al12456)(S49552)(180 Or App 392) State v. Johnson, Devin Eugene (A109533)(S4957 4)(180 Or App 394) Statev. Johnson, Terry Hudson (A105120)(S48641)(1740r App 27) State v. Jones, Morgan Bruce (A108562)(S49556)(181 Or App 662) State v. Morrow, William Allen (A110620)(S49566)(181 Or App 664) State v. Torrez, Anthony (All0550)(S49558)(181 Or App 664) Wallowa County v. Fordice (A113714)(S49521)(181 Or App 222)
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.