340 Or 159•Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, February 14, 2006
Gesamter Gesetzestext
159 MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS (130 P3d 787, 788) BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED February 14, 2006 Barrie and Chandler v. Myers (S53040l. Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 91 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Barrie and Chandler v. Myers (S53041). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 92 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Barrie and Chandler v. Myers (S53042). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 93 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Barrie and Chandler v. Myers (S53043). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's arguments that the Attorney C:reneral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 94 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Barrie and Chandler v. Myers (S53044). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Petitioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 95 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Mathews v. Myers (S53091). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Peti- tioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initia- tive Petition No. 97 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Mathews v. Myers (S53092). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Peti- tioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initia- tive Petition No. 98 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Mathews v. Myers (853093). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Peti- tioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initia- tive Petition No. 99 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (a)-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure. Mathews v. Myers (S53105). Petitioner's request for oral argument is denied. Peti- tioner's arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initia- tive Petition No. 103 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) (al-(d) are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.