347 Or 367•Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, December 9, 2009
Gesamter Gesetzestext
367 MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS (222 P3d 1092) BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED December 9, 2009 Berman v. Kroger (S057802). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 54 (2010) does not comply sub- stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro- posed ballot measure. Berman v. Kroger (S057883). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 57 (2010) does not comply sub- stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro- posed ballot measure. Caruthers v. Kroger (S057687); Day et al v. Kroger (S057693). Petitioner's argu- ment that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 47 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057763). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney Gen- eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 49 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057773). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney Gen- eral's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 50 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057804); Syrett et al v. Kroger (S057814). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Peti- tion No. 51 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney Gen- eral's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure. Day et al v. Kroger (S057884). Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 58 2010) does not comply sub- stantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the pro- posed ballot measure.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.