367 Or 217 ; 367 Or 218•Petitions for review, October 22, 2020
Gesamter Gesetzestext
217 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (474 P3d 390-393, 906-907) ALLOWED October 22, 2020 State v. Belden, Kyle Allan (A163905)(S067922)(303 Or App 438) State v. Knox, Amanda Marie (A168466)(S067585)(302 Or App 654). Petition for review allowed in part, limited to the appropriate disposition of Count 1 in Douglas County case no. 18CR35395 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to her conviction on Count 1 requires reversal. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 18CR35395. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Rossiter, Wenona (A158920)(S067423)(300 Or App 44); State v. Rossiter, Travis Lee (A158973)(S067424)(300 Or App 405). Petition for review allowed in part, limited to the appropriate disposition of Count 1 in Linn County Circuit Court case no. 13CR06277 and Count 1 in Linn County Circuit Court case no. 13CR06278, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant Wenona Rossiter’s Sixth Amendment challenge to her conviction on Count 1 in case no. 13CR06277 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses the conviction on Count 1 in case no. 13CR06277. For the same reasons, the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant Travis Rossiter’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Count 1 in Linn County case no. 13CR06278 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses the conviction on Count 1 in case no. 13CR06278. Decisions of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgments of circuit court reversed in part, and cases remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. WaterWatch of Oregon v. Water Resources Department (A165160)(S067938)(304 Or App 617) DENIED October 22, 2020 Bank of New York Mellon, The v. Brantingham (A166405)(S067874)(303 Or App 649) Bank of New York Mellon, The v. Lash (A168204)(S067912)(303 Or App 456) Department of Human Services v. C. J. A. (A172920/21)(S067959)(305 Or App 707) Department of Human Services v. J. D. G. (A173260)(S067965)(305 Or App 707) Department of Human Services v. K. F. (A173364)(S067944)(305 Or App 605) Department of Human Services v. K. H. H. (A172005)(S067934)(304 Or App 530) Department of Human Services v. M. D. E. (A172864)(S067937)(304 Or App 547)
218 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued (474 P3d 390-391, 393, 906-907) Habibullah, Mohdsidek v. Kelly (A168581)(S067862)(304 Or App 459). Walters, C. J., and Duncan, J., would allow. Heuett v. Fuller (A171810)(S067947)(305 Or App 412) State v. A. L. M. (A166888)(S067968)(305 Or App 389) State v. Deoca, Leonardo Perez Montes (A169042)(S067885)(304 Or App 874) State v. Dixon, Douglass Ryan (A169248)(S067883)(304 Or App 874) State v. Loa, Tomas, Jr. (A170422)(S067979)(305 Or App 411) State v. Maynard, Debra Lynn (A169098)(S067897)(304 Or App 874) State v. Rhamy, Cameron Charles (A165944)(S067903)(304 Or App 28) Wilson, James Edward v. Angelozzi (A169578)(S067871)(304 Or App 649)
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.