Petitions for review, April 8, 2021

367 Or 824 ; 367 Or 825 ; 367 Or 826 ; 367 Or 827Or

Gesamter Gesetzestext

824
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(484 P3d 313-314)
ALLOWED
April 8, 2021
Gates v. Felton (A171633)(S067134)(on order of dismissal); rev dismissed, June 3,
2021 (368 Or 206)
State v. Bernal, Antone Dean (A164359)(S066965)(297 Or App 811). Defendant’s
petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of
Counts 7 and 9 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206
L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. The court accepts the
state’s concession that defendant’s convictions on Counts 7 and 9 in Lincoln
County case no. 15CR49018 must be reversed. The court therefore reverses
defendant’s convictions on Counts 7 and 9 in case no. 15CR49018. This
disposition does not affect the jury’s guilty verdicts on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12,
and 13. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment of circuit court
reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Blue, Kenneth William (A167344)(S067089)(299 Or App 521). Defendant’s
petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of
Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L
Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in
State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s
concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on
Count 1 in Deschutes County case no. 15CR57070 qualifies for plain error
review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore
reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 15CR57070. Decision of
Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part,
and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Chavez-Reyes, Francisco Javier (A168101)(S067751)(303 Or App 161).
Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate
disposition of Counts 1 and 4 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___,
140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied.
The court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment
challenge to his convictions on Counts 1 and 4 in Washington County case
no. 17CR75366 must be reversed. The court therefore reverses defendant’s
convictions on Counts 1 and 4 in case no. 17CR75366. Decision of Court of
Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case
remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Davidson, Dennis James (A165303)(S068231)(307 Or App 478)
State v. Harry, Kester Gordon (A167756)(S067665)(302 Or App 361). Defendant’s
petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of
Count 2 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L
Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in
State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s
concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on
Count 2 in Polk County case no. 17CR07025 qualifies for plain error review
and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses
defendant’s conviction on Count 2 in case no. 17CR07025. Decision of Court of
Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case
remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 	825
(484 P3d 317-320)
State v. Jackson, Thomas Thomas, Jr. (A166925)(S067255)(299 Or App 518).
Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate
disposition of Counts 1 and 5 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140
S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For
reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court
accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to
his convictions on Counts 1 and 5 in Washington County case no. 17CR42780
qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error.
The court therefore reverses defendant’s convictions on Counts 1 and 5 in case
no. 17CR42780. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of
circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further
proceedings.
State v. Johnson, Sean Michael (A165056)(S067082)(298 Or App 554). Defendant’s
petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Counts
1 and 2 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d
583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v.
Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession
that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his convictions on Counts 1
and 2 in Marion County case no. 14C44115 qualifies for plain error review
and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses
defendant’s convictions on Counts 1 and 2 in case no. 14C44115. Decision of
Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment of circuit court reversed in part,
and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. Nakamoto, J.,
would allow review of the fourth and fifth questions presented.
State v. Lackey, Jason Abraham (A164981)(S066809)(297 Or App 191). Defendant’s
petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Count
1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d
583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. The court accepts the state’s
concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction
on Count 1 in Lane County case no. 17CR14500 just be reversed. The court
therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 17CR14500.
Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court
reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Manzanares-Hernandez, Rigoberto (A166020/21)(S066990)(298 Or App
841). Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate
disposition of Count 1 in case no. 16CR74436 and Counts 2 and 3 in case
no. 17CR0770 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390,
206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons
given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts
the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his
conviction on Count 1 in Marion County case no. 16CR74436 and Counts 2
and 3 in Marion County case no. 17CR0770 qualifies for plain error review
and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses
defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 16CR74436 and Counts 2 and 3
in case no. 17CR0770. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment
of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further
proceedings.
State v. Perez-Garcia, Jose Tranquilino (A162994)(S066550)(295 Or App 156).
Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate
826 	PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued
(484 P3d 314-321)
disposition of Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S
Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For
reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court
accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to
his conviction on Count 1 in Marion County case no. 16CR15033 qualifies for
plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court
therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 16CR15033.
Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court
reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Reyes-Herrera, Saul (A170594)(S068223)(307 Or App 500)
State v. Swearingen, James Richard (A165274)(S066877)(298 Or App 56).
Defendant’s petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate
disposition of Count 1 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct
1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons
given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts
the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his
conviction on Count 1 in Multnomah County case no. 16CR22360 qualifies for
plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court
therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1 in case no. 16CR22360.
Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court
reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings.
DENIED
April 8, 2021
Buchalski, Adam V. v. Bowser (A171103)(S068253)(307 Or App 272)
Cardenas, Mario Ernesto Jaimes v. State of Oregon (A173653)(S068277)(308 Or
App 463)
Dalebout, Leroy Neil v. State of Oregon (A170774)(S068291)(307 Or App 659)
Davenport, James Dimitri v. Peters (A170312)(S068254)(307 Or App 500)
Department of Human Services v. B. S. (A173986)(S068325)(308 Or App 463)
Dorn, Daniel Austin v. Bowser (A171054)(S068269)(307 Or App 500)
Felipe-Sarmiento, Cristobal v. Washburn (A170548)(S068199)(307 Or App 272)
Goodwin, William v. Causey (A171269)(S068299)(307 Or App 849)
H. K. v. Spine Surgery Center of Eugene, LLC (A164453)(S068119)(305 Or App
606)
Jensen v. Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV), a division of the
Department of Transportation (A169935)(S068274)(308 Or App 37)
Lincoln Loan Co. v. The Estate of George W. Geppert (A168925)(S068168)(307 Or
App 213)
Lyon, Adam Steven v. Psychiatric Security Review Board (A170297)(S068249)(308
Or App 176)
Martinez, Nicolas v. Cain (A170319)(S068278)(308 Or App 463)
McClanahan, Terry D. v. Washburn (A171268)(S068290)(308 Or App 463)
Medina v. State of Oregon, acting by and through the Department of Fish and
Wildlife (A170744)(S068329)(308 Or App 660)
Powell, Anthony Lashon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A169475)
(S068267)(307 Or App 659)
Rice v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (A171563)(S068152)
(307 Or App 238)
Roberts, Sandra Kay v. State of Oregon (A170309)(S068289)(307 Or App 659)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 	827
(484 P3d 321-326)
Sherrod, Vanessa v. Myers (A170840)(S068303)(307 Or App 849)
State v. Bjornsen, Sigfrit Leslie (A170953/54)(S068232)(308 Or App 175)
State v. Cooley, Patrick Thomas (A171175)(S068233)(308 Or App 175)
State v. Eisenbeisz, Richard Wayne (A170277)(S068271)(308 Or App 169)
State v. Garrett, Michael (A170192)(S068308)(308 Or App 175)
State v. Godines, Maria Ellena (A170372)(S068218)(307 Or App 500)
State v. Gonzalez, Jorge Luis Jacobo (A170181)(A170204)(A170180)(S068256)(308
Or App 176)
State v. Haralamos, Adam King (A171057)(S068314)(307 Or App 850)
State v. Jones, Darin Patrick (A170206)(S068177)(307 Or App 272)
State v. Kelley, Michael Harvey (A169574)(S068344)(307 Or App 608)
State v. Mekuriya, Bewuqetu Abebe (A166416)(S068322)(308 Or App 176)
State v. Moore, Devante Xavier (A168802)(S068310)(307 Or App 649)
State v. Rivera, Jose Mercedes (A170713)(S068281)(308 Or App 463)
State v. Roberts, Jodi Michelle (A170270)(S068276)(308 Or App 225)
State v. Rudd, Brian Curtis (A170133)(S068339)(307 Or App 610)
State v. Shelby, Elric Vincent (A169269/70)(S068324)(307 Or App 500)
State v. Shoop, Sierra Marie (A169741)(S068201)(306 Or App 551)
State v. Speegle, Jami Lorraine (A170809)(S068210)(307 Or App 850)
State v. Weathers, Michael James Robert (A172053)(S068219)(307 Or App 850)
Villanueva, Gustavo v. Cain (A169953)(S068198)(307 Or App 413)(petition and
supplemental petition)
Walton, Tyrone Earl v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A170047)
(S068204)(307 Or App 659)
West-Howell, Anthony Allen v. Bowser (A170171)(S068309)(308 Or App 463)

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.