368 Or 347 ; 368 Or 348•Petitions for review, July 8, 2021
Gesamter Gesetzestext
347 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (489 P3d 540-546) ALLOWED July 8, 2021 State v. Burris, Michael Garrett (A164853)(S068514)(309 Or App 167) State v. Colgrove, Rhonda (A169952)(S068372)(308 Or App 441) State v. Camirand, Scott Leander (A165966/67)(S067790)(303 Or App 1). Petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated, and case remanded to Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Banks, 367 Or 574, 481 P3d 1275 (2021), and State v. Payne, 366 Or 588, 468 P3d 445 (2020). State v. Jones, Eric, (A162977)(S066437)(294 Or App 885). Petition for review allowed in part, limited to appropriate disposition of Counts 1, 5, 6, 7, 14, and 16 in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction on Counts 1, 5, 6, 7, 14, and 16 in Multnomah County case no. 15CR44943 qualifies for plain error review and exercises its discretion to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s convictions on Counts 1, 5, 6, 7, 14, and 16 in case no. 15CR44943. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part; judgment of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings. State v. Montano, Max Paul, Jr. (A167088)(S067400)(300 Or App 812). Petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated, and case remanded to Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020). DENIED July 8, 2021 Asbill, Travis v. Cain (A169864)(S068490)(308 Or App 660) Baughman, Russell Allen, Jr. v. Washburn (A171284)(S068547)(309 Or App 596) Department of Human Services v. K. W. (A171945)(S068182)(307 Or App 17) Department of Human Services v. S. S. (A172747-49)(S068136)(307 Or App 37) Duvigneaud, Barry James v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A172140)(S068545)(310 Or App 170) Hisey v. Patrick (A165885)(S068501)(309 Or App 625) Inman, Kenneth Eugene v. Bowser (A170136)(S068423)(308 Or App 458) Johnson, Edwin Roy v. Washburn (A171437)(S068474)(310 Or App 170) Johnson, Matthew Mayfield, Jr. v. State of Oregon (A172300)(S068483)(309 Or App 166) Nevarez, Hank David v. Washburn (A170842)(S068577)(310 Or App 170) 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Clackamas County (A174968)(S068517)(309 Or App 499) Roof, Frank v. Blewett (A173914)(S068557)(310 Or App 868) State v. Bauer, John M. (A172256)(S068429)(309 Or App 765) State v. Fulmer, Tamara Louise (A171105)(S068462)(308 Or App 106) State v. Moore, Israel Marcel (A171043)(S068535)(309 Or App 416) State v. Negron, Angel Alexander (A171946)(S068485)(310 Or App 221). Walters, C. J., and Flynn, J., would allow.
348 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued (489 P3d 544-545) State v. Pittman, Jeffrey Allen (A171698/99)(A171703)(S068513)(310 Or App 170) State v. Pusztai, Thomas David (A165949/50)(S068506)(309 Or App 95) State v. Woods, Lavelle Damont (A170359)(S068492)(309 Or App 421) MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITION (497 P3d 721) CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS, MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS July 13, 2021 Einarsson v. Indoor Billboard Northwest, Inc. (S068228)(alternative writ of mandamus allowed February 4, 2021 (367 Or 536)). Alternative writ of mandamus dismissed.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.