Rudig v. Clackamas County Assessor

TC-MD 170306GOrtc

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 170306G 1
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT
MAGISTRATE DIVISION
Property Tax
JAMES D. RUDIG, )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff, TC-MD 170306G
v.
CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR,
FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1
Defendant.
Plaintiff appealed Defendant’s addition of omitted property value to Account Number
00318374 (subject property) for the 2014–15 to 2016–17 assessment and tax rolls. Defendant
requested full access to the subject property for an inspection, which Plaintiff refused. The court
granted Defendant’s ensuing motion to compel in its Order Compelling Full Inspection of
Property, incorporated herein by reference. Thirteen days later, Plaintiff filed a letter
withdrawing his Complaint. Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed.
Dated this day of February, 2018
POUL F. LUNDGREN
MAGISTRATE
If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the
Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,
Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street,
Salem, OR.
Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final
Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed.
TCR-MD 19 B.
This document was signed by Magistrate Poul F. Lundgren and entered on
February 6, 2018.
1 This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered
January 19, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision
of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1).

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.