In the Matter of Bernard Grooms

CourtListener 10148916Scctapp04.03.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Bernard
Grooms, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001626

Appeal From Richland County
Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-108
Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed March 4, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
See also In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the
Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator
involuntary commitment appeals).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.