State v. D'Quan Bolton

CourtListener 10854109Scctapp06.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

D'Quan Lamar Bolton, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2024-001275

Appeal From York County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-202
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.