CourtListener 10356994•Christian, Antoine Leon AKA Christian, Reginald Jerome
Christian, Antoine Leon AKA Christian, Reginald Jerome
CourtListener 10356994Texcrimapp12.03.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-39,987-04
EX PARTE REGINALD JEROME CHRISTIAN
AKA ANTOINE LEON CHRISTIAN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1093011-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to two years
and nine months’ imprisonment. In this post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus,
Applicant alleges that his plea was involuntary because he did not know that Officer Gerald Goines,
an investigating officer involved in his case, had engaged in misconduct in other cases. We filed and
set the case for submission to determine:
(1) Was Gerald Goines’s conduct in this case the type of misconduct that gives rise to
an inference of falsity under Ex parte Mathews, 638 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. Crim. App.
2022)?;
2
(2) Assuming an inference of falsity under Mathews applies, do the facts of this case
rebut that inference of falsity?; and
(3) Assuming an inference of falsity applies and was not rebutted by the facts of this
case, was the false evidence provided by Gerald Goines material to Applicant’s guilty
plea?
This Court ultimately determined that Applicant had failed to establish the applicability of
the inference of falsity under Mathews because Applicant’s case does not involve the type of
misconduct that gives rise to an inference of falsity. Ex parte Christian, __ S.W.3d __, 2024 WL
4281127 (Tex. Crim. App. 2024). The Court, therefore, remanded the case to the trial court to
consider Applicant’s involuntary plea claim without reference to an inference of falsity regarding
Goines’s conduct in Applicant’s case. Id.
In response to this Court’s remand order, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions
of law recommending relief be denied because Applicant failed to establish that he would have
proceeded to trial if he had been aware of the potential impeachment evidence concerning Officer
Goines’ misconduct in other cases. Ex parte Palmberg, 491 S.W.3d 804, 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
2016); Ex parte Barnaby, 475 S.W.3d 316, 325 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015). We agree with the trial
court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Relied is denied.
Delivered: March 12, 2025
Do not publish
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.