Ray Jackson v. BOKF, NA DBA Bank of Texas

CourtListener 10848322Txctapp121.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Opinion issued April 21, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-25-01090-CV
———————————
RAY JACKSON, Appellant
V.
BOKF, NA D/B/A BANK OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1221766

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ray Jackson has not established indigence, and has neither paid for

nor made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1

(indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to

appellant’s fault). Appellant also failed to respond to our notice that his appeal was
subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no

clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault), 42.3(b)–(c) (allowing involuntary

dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Guiney.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.