CourtListener 10848329•Brelin Keithian Coleman v. the State of Texas
Brelin Keithian Coleman v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10848329Txctapp121.04.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Opinion issued April 21, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-26-00179-CR
NO. 01-26-00180-CR
———————————
BRELIN KEITHIAN COLEMAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1824733 and 1824734
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted in trial court cause number 1824733
of the offense of sexual assault and was sentenced on September 25, 2025 to 10 years
in the Correctional Institutions Division of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice. In trial court cause number 1824734, appellant was convicted of the offense
of burglary with intent to commit other felony and was sentenced on September 25,
2018 to 10 years in the Correctional Institutions Division of the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice, with the two sentences to run concurrently. The trial court
certified that these cases were not plea-bargain cases and that appellant had the right
to appeal. Appellant did not file his notices of appeal until February 11, 2026.
In criminal cases, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal is thirty days after
sentence is imposed, unless appellant files a timely motion for new trial. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Because the clerk’s records contain no motions for new trial,
appellant’s notices of appeal were due thirty days after September 25, 2025, or by
October 26, 2025. Because appellant did not file his notices of appeal until February
11, 2026, the notices of appeal were not timely filed. Without a timely-filed notice
of appeal, we lack jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1.
On March 10, 2026, the Court issued notices in these two appeals concerning
the untimely notices of appeal and requesting a response from appellant. No
responses were received.
Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. See Slaton v.
State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Gunn, Caughey, and Morgan.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.