CourtListener 10677887•In Re Bobby Joe Buckner v. the State of Texas
In Re Bobby Joe Buckner v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10677887Txctapp1025.09.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00320-CR
In re Bobby Joe Buckner
Original Proceeding
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus was filed on September 5, 2025.
There are procedural problems with the petition, including but not limited to,
Relator’s failure to provide proof of service of the petition to the trial court
judge and the State, and the documents relied on by Relator are not properly
sworn. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 52.3(k); 52.7(a), (c); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.
CODE § 132.001(c). Nevertheless, we use Rule 2 to suspend the operation of
these rules and deny relator’s petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
Relator’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, also filed on September 5, 2025, is
dismissed as moot.
LEE HARRIS
Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: September 25, 2025
Before Justice Smith,
Justice Harris, and
Senior Justice Davis 1
Petition denied
Motion dismissed
Do Not Publish
OT06
1 The Honorable Rex Davis, Senior Justice (Retired) of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by
assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 74.003, 75.002,
75.003.
In re Buckner Page 2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.