In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10385493Txctapp1124.04.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

11TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND, TEXAS
JUDGMENT

In re Christopher M. Perricone, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11-25-00078-CV * April 24, 2025

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.
(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Christopher M. Perricone’s petition for writ of
mandamus and concludes that the petition should be dismissed in part for want of
jurisdiction and denied in part. We dismiss the portion of Christopher M.
Perricone’s petition for writ of mandamus that seeks to set aside the expired
temporary restraining order, and we deny the remainder of his petition. Therefore,
in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is
dismissed in part and denied in part.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.