County of Hidalgo, Texas v. Bernardo Beltran-Rosas

CourtListener 10829291Txctapp1326.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NUMBER 13-26-00150-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

COUNTY OF HIDALGO, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

BERNARDO BELTRAN-ROSAS, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 389TH DISTRICT COURT
OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal.

Based on the motion, appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

The Court, having considered appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that

the unopposed motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore,
appellant’s unopposed amended motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

dismissed.

The costs are taxed against the appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal

at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

JENNY CRON
Justice

Delivered and filed on the
26th day of March, 2026.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.