Cerda Engineering LLC A/K/A Cerda Plumbing LLC and Andrew Cerda v. Daniel Rohweder and Emily Rohweder

CourtListener 10841474Txctapp1302.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NUMBER 13-25-00574-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CERDA ENGINEERING LLC
A/K/A CERDA PLUMBING LLC
AND ANDREW CERDA, Appellants,

v.

DANIEL ROHWEDER
AND EMILY ROHWEDER, Appellees.

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW
OF NAVARRO COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca
This matter is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed amended motion to

dismiss appeal.1 On February 6, 2026, we abated this appeal for the parties to effectuate

1
This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 73.001.
a settlement agreement. Based on the motion, the parties have resolved their dispute,

and appellants request that the appeal be dismissed.

The Court, having considered appellants’ unopposed amended motion to dismiss,

is of the opinion that the unopposed motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). Therefore, we reinstate the case, grant appellants’ unopposed amended

motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal.

In accordance with the unopposed motion, costs will be taxed against the party

incurring the same. See id. R. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the appellants’

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

YSMAEL D. FONSECA
Justice

Delivered and filed on the
2nd day of April, 2026.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.