CourtListener 10270646•In Re Fariborz Shojai v. the State of Texas
In Re Fariborz Shojai v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10270646Txctapp1407.11.2024
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Motions Dismissed; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and
Memorandum Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed November 7, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00761-CV
IN RE FARIBORZ SHOJAI, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
129th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2020-50900
MEMORANDUM MAJORITY OPINION
On October 14, 2024, relator Fariborz Shojai filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R.
App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Michael
Gomez, presiding judge of the 129th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the
trial court’s August 9, 2024 order granting real party in interest Morrell Masonry
Supply Inc.’s partial summary judgment and the trial court’s August 16, 2024
denial of relator’s motion for summary judgment. On October 24, 2024, relator
filed what appears to either amend or supplement his petition for writ of mandamus
requesting this court “to declare the notice of lis pendens on 1628 Potomac,
Houston, TX is moot, void and null . . . .”
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. All pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson (Spain, J., dissenting).
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.