CourtListener 10675059•Dr. James Whitfield v. Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District and Tammy Nakamura
Dr. James Whitfield v. Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District and Tammy Nakamura
CourtListener 10675059Txctapp218.09.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-24-00550-CV
___________________________
DR. JAMES WHITFIELD, Appellant
V.
GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND
TAMMY NAKAMURA, Appellees
On Appeal from the 348th District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 348-340502-23
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on August 6, 2025. On August 18, 2025, we notified
appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an
accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an
extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have
received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: September 18, 2025
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.