Timothy P. Coyne v. SPCP Cobblestone Owner, LLC

CourtListener 10762773Txctapp218.12.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-25-00283-CV
___________________________

TIMOTHY P. COYNE, Appellant

V.

SPCP COBBLESTONE OWNER, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025-002739-1

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant’s brief was due on October 30, 2025. On November 18, 2025, we

notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution unless, on or before December 1, 2025, appellant filed with the court an

appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s

untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 18, 2025

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.