In Re Salman Ali v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10863906Txctapp220.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-26-00285-CV
___________________________

IN RE SALMAN ALI, Relator

Original Proceeding
481st District Court of Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. 23-4984-481

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wallach, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. The trial court heard conflicting evidence

regarding relator’s purported inability to pay; relator failed to persuade the trial court.

See Ex parte Dabau, 732 S.W.2d 773, 777 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1987, orig.

proceeding). The trial court is the factfinder, and it is its responsibility to weigh the

evidence and judge the witnesses’ credibility. Ex Parte Roosth, No. B14-93-01037-CV,

1994 WL 2012, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 6, 1994, orig. proceeding)

(not designated for publication). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas

corpus is denied.

Having denied relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, we vacate the

portion of our May 7, 2026 order providing for his discharge on the execution and

filing of a bond in the amount of $100,000.

Per Curiam

Delivered: May 20, 2026

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.