CourtListener 10655992•Kim Carlene Jennings v. Segal Properties
Kim Carlene Jennings v. Segal Properties
CourtListener 10655992Txctapp315.08.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00060-CV
Kim Carlene Jennings, Appellant
v.
Segal Properties, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY
NO. 24CCV01296, THE HONORABLE PAUL A. MOTZ, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kim Jennings, appearing pro se, appeals from the trial court’s take-nothing
judgment in her suit against her former landlord, Segal Properties. However, even construed
liberally, Jennings’ appeal is inadequately briefed. See Henderson v. Armbrust & Brown, PLLC,
No. 03-24-00509-CV, 2025 WL 492506, at *3 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 14, 2025, no pet.)
(mem. op.). While Jennings generally complains about a bedbug infestation at her former
residence, she has failed to:
• assign reversible error to any part of the trial court’s judgment or otherwise
present a legally cognizable issue for our review, see Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f)
(requiring brief to “state concisely all issues or points presented for review”);
• provide substantive arguments, cite authority, or otherwise advance a legally
cognizable theory demonstrating why or how the trial court erred, see Tex. R.
App. P. 38.1(i) (requiring brief to “contain a clear and concise argument for the
contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities”); or
• pray for any legally cognizable form of relief, see Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(j)
(requiring brief to “contain a short conclusion that clearly states the nature of the
relief sought”).
In other words, Jennings has failed to say what the trial court did wrong, why it
was wrong, and how we can fix it. Holding Jennings to the same standard as parties represented
by counsel, we hold she has waived any issues that she may have by inadequate briefing.
Hughes v. Armadillo Props., No. 03-15-00698-CV, 2016 WL 5349380, at *2 (Tex. App.—
Austin Sept. 20, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.). Because Jennings’ brief presents nothing for our
review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
__________________________________________
Maggie Ellis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Ellis
Affirmed
Filed: August 15, 2025
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.