Aaron Hoyte and Isaiah Archibald v. FKH SFR L, L.P.

CourtListener 10681191Txctapp424.09.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00478-CV

Aaron HOYTE and Isaiah Archibald,
Appellants

v.

FKH SFR L, L.P.,
Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025CV05128
Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 24, 2025

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellants’ brief was due to be filed by September 2, 2025. Neither the brief nor a motion

for extension of time has been filed.

On September 8, 2025, we ordered appellants to file, no later than September 18, 2025,

their brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) their failure to timely file a brief, and

(2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellants’ failure to timely file a brief. Our order

cautioned appellants that if they failed to timely file a brief and the written response by September
04-25-00478-CV

18, 2025, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see

also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court

order). Appellants did not file a timely response to our September 8, 2025 order. We dismiss this

appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

-2-

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.