CourtListener 10758629•Dalila Agiza v. T Slash Bar Texas
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00334-CV
Dalila AGIZA,
Appellant
v.
T SLASH BAR TEXAS,
Appellee
From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025CV01730
Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2025
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On October 13, 2025, we ordered appellant’s brief stricken. We further ordered appellant
to file an amended brief that complies with Rules 9.4 and 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure on or before October 31, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a).
Neither the amended brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Instead, on October 14,
2025, appellant filed “Appellant’s Verified Objection and Motion to Reinstate Supplemental Brief
Limited to Jurisdictional Defects, and Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend” and “Appellant’s
04-25-003354-CV
Supplemental Objection and Motion for Reconsideration of October 13, 2025 Orders.” On
November 4, 2025, we denied these two motions, and we ordered appellant to file an amended
brief complying with Rules 38.1 and 9.4. on or before November 11, 2025. We admonished
appellant that if she failed to timely file the amended brief, we would dismiss for want of
prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3.
Appellant has not filed the amended brief ordered by the court. Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed. 1
PER CURIAM
1
All of appellant’s pending motions are denied.
-2-
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.