In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10872207Txctapp403.06.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-26-00273-CV

IN RE TEXAS FARM BUREAU UNDERWRITERS

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 6, 2026, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an

extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused

its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of

appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After

considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator has not shown that it is entitled

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 24-17793, styled Vinson v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Company, pending
in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III presiding.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.