CourtListener 9434208•J Edwards Concrete & Construction LLC v. David Olvera and Sarah Olvera
J Edwards Concrete & Construction LLC v. David Olvera and Sarah Olvera
CourtListener 9434208Txctapp919.10.2023
Gesamter Gesetzestext
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-23-00080-CV
__________________
J EDWARDS CONCRETE & CONSTRUCTION LLC, Appellant
V.
DAVID OLVERA AND SARAH OLVERA, Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 22-02-02119-CV
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
J Edwards Concrete & Construction LLC, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal
from a final default judgment, which the trial court signed on February 8, 2023.
On June 8, 2023, the District Clerk notified the Court that Appellant is not
entitled to appeal without paying the fee for the record and Appellant had failed to
pay or to arrange to pay for the clerk’s record in the appeal. On that same day, we
notified the parties that the clerk’s record had not been filed and we warned
Appellant that we would dismiss the appeal unless it arranged to pay the fee required
1
to file the clerk’s record or it explained that it needed additional time to do so by
July 10, 2023. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant then arranged for and paid for
the clerk’s record, and the clerk’s record was filed with this Court on July 19, 2023.
On July 20, 2023, the Court sent a notice notifying the Appellant that the
Appellant had not made arrangements to pay for and file a Reporter’s Record. On
August 22, 2023, we notified the parties that the Court had still not received a
response to the Court’s notice regarding non-payment for the reporter’s record and
we confirmed that no reporter’s record had been filed. On that same date, we also
notified the Appellant that Appellant’s brief was due on or before Thursday,
September 21, 2023. On September 22, 2023, we notified Appellant that Appellant’s
brief was past due and that if the brief of Appellant and a motion for extension of
time were not filed by Monday, October 2, 2023, the cause would be submitted to
the Court on the clerk’s record alone, and that submission without briefs may result
in dismissal for want of prosecution.
In the absence of a brief from Appellant or a satisfactory explanation
justifying Appellant’s failure to file a brief and failure to respond to the Court’s
notices, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),
42.3, 43.2(f).
2
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on October 18, 2023
Opinion Delivered October 19, 2023
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
3
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.