Jorge Angel Davila v. the State of Texas

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-24-00084-CR
NO. 09-24-00085-CR
__________________

JORGE ANGEL DAVILA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause Nos. F21-37111 and F21-38015
__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 6, 2022, the trial court sentenced Jorge Angel Davila on convictions

for aggravated sexual assault of a child and sexual assault of a child. In each case,

Trial Court Cause Number 21-37111 and Trial Court Cause Number 21-38015, the

trial court certified that the case resulted from a plea-bargain case and that the

1
defendant did not have a right to appeal.1 More than a year later—on March 3,

2024—Davila, acting pro se, filed a joint notice of appeal in Trial Court Cause

Numbers 21-37111 and 21-38015. 2

After Davila filed the joint notice of appeal in the two cases with the Jefferson

County District Clerk, the District Clerk sent the notices of appeal and the trial

court’s certifications that indicate Davila did not have the right to appeal to the Ninth

Court of Appeals. After the appeals were filed on the Ninth Court’s docket, the Clerk

of the Ninth Court of Appeals sent a letter to the parties on March 6, 2024, notifying

them that the Court would dismiss the appeals unless the appellant could establish

that the trial court’s certifications were incorrect.

1A slight discrepancy in the case numbers on Judgments of Conviction and

the numbers assigned to the appeals occurred because Jefferson County
implemented a new case numbering system after the trial court signed the judgments.
The change resulted in Trial Court Cause Number 21-37111 being renumbered
Cause Number F21-37111 and in Trial Court Cause Number 21-38015 being
renumbered Cause Number F21-38015.
2The joint notice was filed in both cases too late to qualify for the fifteen-day

grace period in which the Rules of Appellate Procedure allow this Court to grant
appellants who fall within the fifteen-day grace period an opportunity, when
requested in a motion, to correct their failure to file a notice of appeal by the deadline
by which the notice of appeal was due. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 26.2, 26.3.
2
Because the records lack certifications that show Davila has the right of

appeal, we dismiss the appeals. 3

APPEALS DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 30, 2024
Opinion Delivered May 1, 2024
Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.

3See id. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

3