2619094•Gelila Wossene v. Landmark Tower Service Center, Inc. and American Home Assurance Company
Gelila Wossene v. Landmark Tower Service Center, Inc. and American Home Assurance Company
2619094Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Powell and Senior Judge Clements GELILA WOSSENE MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 2619-09-4 PER CURIAM APRIL 13, 2010 LANDMARK TOWER SERVICE CENTER, INC. AND AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Gelila Wossene, pro se, on briefs). (Jamie M. Keenan; Jordan Coyne & Savits, L.L.P., on brief), for appellees. Gelila Wossene appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that the deputy commissioner correctly determined that Wossene failed to establish a compensible injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Wossene v. Landmark Tower Service Center, Inc., VWC File No. 236-08-79 (Oct. 30, 2009). * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 - We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.1 Affirmed. 1 We deny appellant’s motion filed on March 2, 2010, requesting leave to file a “late statement of questions presented and designation of contents of appendix.” We also deny the motion to dismiss filed by appellees on March 2, 2010.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.