Bernard Luigi Dinicola, Jr. v. Target Corporation

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata
BERNARD LUIGI DINICOLA, JR.
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1010-09-4 	PER CURIAM
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
TARGET CORPORATION
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Bernard L. DiNicola, Jr., pro se, on brief).
(Joseph F. Giordano; Pia J. Miller; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on
brief), for appellee.
Bernard Luigi DiNicola, Jr. appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation
Commission finding that his claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed
the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See DiNicola v. Target
Corp., VWC File No. 226-72-33 (Apr. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument and
summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.