Dianna L. Kay v. City of Norfolk

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton
DIANNA L. KAY
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 2983-03-1 	PER CURIAM
MARCH 2, 2004
CITY OF NORFOLK
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Andrew M. Sacks; Keith J. Leonard; Sacks & Sacks, on brief), for
appellant.
(Joan E. Mahoney, Assistant City Attorney, on brief), for appellee.
Dianna L. Kay appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying
her claim for benefits because she failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out
of her employment on November 7, 2001. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
commission in its final opinion. See Kay v. Norfolk (City of) Police Dep’t, VWC File No.
207-63-37 (Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.