Sodexho, Inc. and et. al. v. Curtis Clanton

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Senior Judge Coleman
SODEXHO, INC. AND
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE
OF PENNSYLVANIA/AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC.
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 2364-07-2 	PER CURIAM
FEBRUARY 12, 2008
CURTIS CLANTON
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Bryan J. Olmos; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief), for
appellants.
(Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, on brief), for appellee.
Sodexho, Inc. and its insurer contend the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred in
finding that Curtis Clanton proved he sustained a compensable change in condition and awarding
him temporary total disability benefits commencing April 14, 2006. We have reviewed the
record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Clanton v. Sodexho,
Inc., VWC File No. 221-53-73 (Aug. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily
affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403;
Rule 5A:27.1
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
1 In rendering our decision, we have considered only those documents which were in the
record and properly before the commission when it rendered its decision.