1568152•Tier 1, L.L.C. and Technology Insurance Company v. David Alberto Sandres-Sanchez
Tier 1, L.L.C. and Technology Insurance Company v. David Alberto Sandres-Sanchez
1568152Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, O’Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner TIER 1, L.L.C. AND TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 1568-15-2 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 2, 2016 DAVID ALBERTO SANDRES-SANCHEZ FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (S. Vernon Priddy III; Stephen A. Marshall; Two Rivers Law Group, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Bryan G. Bosta; Becker, Kellogg & Berry, P.C., on brief), for appellee. Tier 1, L.L.C. and Technology Insurance Company (appellants) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. Appellants allege the Commission erred in finding the evidence sufficient to prove that David Alberto Sandres-Sanchez was an employee of Tier 1, rather than an independent contractor, when he sustained an injury by accident arising out of his employment. We have reviewed the record and the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its opinion. See Sandres-Sanchez v. Tier 1, L.L.C., VWC File VA02000017292 (Sept. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. UNPUBLISHED
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.