2602952•Southtech, Inc., et al. v Allison Davis
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff
SOUTHTECH, INC.
AND
YASUDA FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. Record No. 2602-95-2 PER CURIAM
MARCH 19, 1996
ALLISON DAVIS
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS'
COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(William C. Walker; Bradford C. Jacob; Taylor &
Walker, on brief), for appellants.
(B. Mayes Marks, Jr., on brief), for appellee.
Southtech, Inc. and its insurer contend that the Workers'
Compensation Commission erred in finding that Allison Davis'
bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a compensable
occupational disease within the meaning of "disease" under the
Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act").
*Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in
Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___
(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from
cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or
however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under
the present provisions of the Act").
Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.2 Reversed.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff
SOUTHTECH, INC.
AND
YASUDA FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Vv. Record No. 2602-95-2 PER CURIAM
MARCH 19, 1996
ALLISON DAVIS
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS '
COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(William C. Walker; Bradford C. Jacob; Taylor &
Walker, on brief), for appellants.
(B. Mayes Marks, Jr., on brief), for appellee.
Southtech, Inc. and its insurer contend that the Workers'
Compensation Commission erred in finding that Allison Davis'
bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a compensable
occupational disease within the meaning of "disease" under the
Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act").
This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in
Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, Va. , 1 S.E.2d ;
(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from
cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or
however defined, are, aS a matter of law, not compensable under
the present provisions of the Act").
Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.
"Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
Reversed.
2Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.