Claude Wesly Stotts v. Boart Longyear Company and Zurich American Insurance Company

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis
CLAUDE WESLY STOOTS
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1699-10-3 	PER CURIAM
JANUARY 11, 2011
BOART LONGYEAR COMPANY AND
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Ginger J. Largen; J.D. Morefield; Morefield & Largen, on brief), for
appellant.
(Kevin W. Cloe; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on
brief), for appellees.
Claude W. Stoots appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding
that Stoots did not adequately market his residual work capacity. We have reviewed the record
and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Stoots v. Boart Longyear Co.,
VWC File No. 232-80-81 (July 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.