Belinda D. Bell v. Best Buy Company, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

1123104Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Humphreys, Powell and Senior Judge Clements
BELINDA D. BELL
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1123-10-4 	PER CURIAM
OCTOBER 12, 2010
BEST BUY COMPANY, INC. AND
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Dean E. Wanderer; Dean E. Wanderer & Associates, on brief), for
appellant.
(J. David Griffin; Winchester Law Group, P.C., on brief), for
appellees.
Belinda D. Bell appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. On
appeal, she contends the commission erred when it (1) found her August 31, 1998 claim for
benefits merged into the commission’s award, or, alternatively, was waived or abandoned;
(2) determined she was not entitled to permanent partial disability benefits under Code
§ 65.2-503; and (3) determined her claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We have
reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bell v.
Best Buy, Inc., VWC File No. 188-97-55 (May 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and
summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 -
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.