1123104•Belinda D. Bell v. Best Buy Company, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Belinda D. Bell v. Best Buy Company, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
1123104Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Powell and Senior Judge Clements BELINDA D. BELL MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 1123-10-4 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 12, 2010 BEST BUY COMPANY, INC. AND LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Dean E. Wanderer; Dean E. Wanderer & Associates, on brief), for appellant. (J. David Griffin; Winchester Law Group, P.C., on brief), for appellees. Belinda D. Bell appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. On appeal, she contends the commission erred when it (1) found her August 31, 1998 claim for benefits merged into the commission’s award, or, alternatively, was waived or abandoned; (2) determined she was not entitled to permanent partial disability benefits under Code § 65.2-503; and (3) determined her claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bell v. Best Buy, Inc., VWC File No. 188-97-55 (May 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 - materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.