Pilot Corporation and Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Center v. Renicia Gregory

2162134Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Senior Judge Bumgardner
PILOT CORPORATION AND
PILOT CORPORATION AND
PILOT TRAVEL CENTER
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 2162-13-4 	PER CURIAM
MARCH 18, 2014
RENICIA GREGORY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Heather K. Bardot; Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, P.C.,
on brief), for appellants.
(Brenda C. Moses; The Moses Law Firm, PC, on brief), for appellee.
Pilot Corporation and Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Center (“employer”) appeal a
decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the commission”) finding that Renicia
Gregory (“claimant”) proved she sustained a compensable injury to her right shoulder and
mid-back in an accident on August 30, 2012.1 Employer also maintains the commission erred in
finding claimant proved her disability was related to a compensable injury by accident. We have
reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See
Gregory v. Pilot Corp., JCN VA02000012201 (Oct. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
1 Employer acknowledges it originally appealed the commission’s finding that claimant
proved she sustained a compensable injury to her lower back as a result of the August 30, 2012
accident, but has now abandoned that argument.
UNPUBLISHED
- 2 -
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.