2270951•Denise V. Siegfeldt v Virginia Employment Comm
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia DENISE V. SIEGFELDT MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY v. Record No. 2270-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 11, 1996 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Walter J. Ford, Judge Denise V. Siegfeldt, pro se. Cheryl A. Wilkerson, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; Lisa J. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Denise V. Siegfeldt petitioned for a judicial review of a decision from the Virginia Employment Commission. Because her petition did not name a party required by the statute and was not served within a reasonable time, the circuit court dismissed the petition. Siegfeldt appeals from this order. We affirm. "When the legislature has prescribed limitations within which the right of appeal may be exercised, such limitations are exclusive, and the court cannot modify or enlarge them without express statutory authority." Blankenship v. Virginia Unemployment Compensation Comm'n, 177 Va. 250, 254, 13 S.E.2d 409, 411 (1941). Upon review of the record, we find no reversible error in the circuit court judge's ruling.
- 2 - Affirmed.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia DENISE V. SIEGFELDT MEMORANDUM OPINION BY Vv. Record No. 2270-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 11, 1996 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Walter J. Ford, Judge Denise V. Siegfeldt, pro se. Cheryl A. Wilkerson, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; Lisa J. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. Denise V. Siegfeldt petitioned for a judicial review of a decision from the Virginia Employment Commission. Because her petition did not name a party required by the statute and was not served within a reasonable time, the circuit court dismissed the petition. Siegfeldt appeals from this order. We affirm. "When the legislature has prescribed limitations within which the right of appeal may be exercised, such limitations are exclusive, and the court cannot modify or enlarge them without express Statutory authority." Blankenship v. Virginia Unemployment Compensation Comm'n, 177 Va. 250, 254, 13 S.E.2d 409, 411 (1941). Upon review of the record, we find no reversible error in the circuit court judge's ruling. "Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Affirmed. - 2 -
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.