2265044•Matthew William Newberger v. Travilian Homes, Inc. and Erie Insurance Exchange
Matthew William Newberger v. Travilian Homes, Inc. and Erie Insurance Exchange
2265044Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata MATTHEW WILLIAM NEWBERGER MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 2265-04-4 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 8, 2005 TRAVILIAN HOMES, INC. AND ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Dean E. Wanderer; Dean E. Wanderer & Associates, on brief), for appellant. (Daniel E. Lynch; John T. Cornett, Jr.; Williams & Lynch, on brief), for appellees. Matthew William Newberger (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that he failed to prove that his condition/disability after December 9, 2002, was causally related to his compensable October 31, 2002 injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Newberger v. Travilian Homes, Inc., VWC File No. 214-56-01 (Aug. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 - presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.1 Affirmed. 1 Claimant also argues on appeal that he was entitled to a de facto award and the burden of proof should have shifted to employer to show that his condition had changed from that of total or partial disability. Claimant did not raise this argument or theory of recovery before the commission. Accordingly, we will not consider it for the first time on appeal. See Rule 5A:18; see also Kendrick v. Nationwide Homes, Inc., 4 Va. App. 189, 192, 355 S.E.2d 347, 349 (1987). Moreover, the record does not reflect any reason to invoke the good cause or ends of justice exceptions to Rule 5A:18.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.