Henry M. Snead v. Virginia Employment Commission and Jaunt, Inc.

1406092Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis
HENRY M. SNEAD
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1406-09-2 	PER CURIAM
DECEMBER 22, 2009
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION AND
JAUNT, INC.
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Edward L. Hogshire, Judge
(Robert P. Dwoskin, on brief), for appellant.
(William C. Mims, Attorney General; Elizabeth B. Peay, Assistant
Attorney General, on brief), for appellee Virginia Employment
Commission.
No brief for appellee Jaunt, Inc.
Henry M. Snead appeals from an order of the trial court that affirmed a decision of the
Virginia Employment Commission (VEC). The VEC concluded that a deputy’s determination
that Snead’s misconduct disqualified him from benefits was final because Snead failed to file a
timely appeal and presented no good cause to extend the filing deadline. We have reviewed the
record, the VEC opinion, and the trial court’s May 29, 2009 final order, and find that this appeal
is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the VEC’s opinion, as
affirmed by the trial court in its final order dismissing Snead’s petition for judicial review of the
VEC’s decision. See Snead v. Jaunt, Inc., VEC Decision 75830-C (Dec. 22, 2005), affirmed by
Snead v. Virginia Employment Comm’n, Case No. CL06-21 (May 29, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 -
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.