0044054•Truland Systems Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Richard L. Bailey
Truland Systems Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. Richard L. Bailey
0044054Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Bumgardner, Kelsey and Senior Judge Hodges TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0044-05-4 PER CURIAM MAY 10, 2005 RICHARD L. BAILEY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Francis H. Foley; The Hartford Staff Counsel, on brief), for appellants. (Julie H. Heiden; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & Lightfoot, L.L.P., on brief), for appellee. Truland Systems Corporation and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that employer failed to prove that Richard L. Bailey was terminated for justified cause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bailey v. Truland Systems Corp., VWC File No. 217-10-25 (Dec. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.