D. Michael Ingram v Donna Snarr-Ingram

1158954Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Chief Judge Moon, Judge Bray and Senior Judge Duff
Argued at Alexandria, Virginia
D. MICHAEL INGRAM MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1158-95-4 	PER CURIAM
MAY 21, 1996
DONNA SNARR-INGRAM
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY
Paul F. Sheridan, Judge
D. Michael Ingram, pro se.
No brief or argument for appellee.
Code § 20-108.2(G)(3) provides, in shared custody cases,
that the amount of child support to be paid is the difference
between the amounts owed by each parent to the other parent, with
the parent owing the larger amount paying the difference to the
other. 	We reject the appellee's assertion that the money is
owing to the child, not the other parent.
From the record before us it appears that the terms of the
statute were not followed in calculating the amount of the child
support. 	The order appealed from is reversed and remanded.
It is also unclear from the record whether the appellant's
second issue, viz., the amount of the appellee's health insurance
costs, has merit. 	Upon remand the trial court shall make a
factual finding, based upon additional evidence, if necessary, as
to the actual health costs incurred.
*Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
2
Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is reversed and
remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and
remanded.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.