2020954•Bok Duk Kim v Cash Flex, et al.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff BOK DUK KIM v. Record No. 2020-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM CASH FLEX MARCH 12, 1996 AND LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Bok Duk Kim, pro se, on brief). (Michael L. Zimmerman; Brault, Palmer, Grove, Zimmerman, White & Mims, on brief), for appellees. Bok Duk Kim appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission dismissing her application alleging an occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision
2 Affirmed.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff BOK DUK KIM v. Record No. 2020-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM CASH FLEX MARCH 12, 1996 AND LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS ' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Bok Duk Kim, pro se, on brief). (Michael L. Zimmerman; Brault, Palmer, Grove, Zimmerman, White & Mims, on brief), for appellees. Bok Duk Kim appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission dismissing her application alleging an occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, Va. , , S.E.2d , (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, aS a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision "Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Affirmed. 2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.