2141044•E.I.T., Inc. and Chubb Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Priscilla G. Thomas
E.I.T., Inc. and Chubb Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Priscilla G. Thomas
2141044Vactapp
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Frank and Clements E.I.T., INC. AND CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 2141-04-4 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 1, 2005 PRISCILLA G. THOMAS FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert C. Baker, Jr.; Dobbs & Baker, on brief), for appellants. (Andrew S. Kasmer; Chasen & Boscolo, on brief), for appellee. E.I.T. Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as employer) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Priscilla G. Thomas proved that she did not unjustifiably refuse employer’s offer of selective employment. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Thomas v. E.I.T. Inc., VWC File No. 210-53-09 (Aug. 31, 2004). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.