0206152•Big Lots Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company v. Howard Clute
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, O’Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner BIG LOTS STORES, INC. AND ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0206-15-2 PER CURIAM JUNE 9, 2015 HOWARD CLUTE FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Nicholas P. Marrone; Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Michael J. Beste; Reinhardt Harper Davis, PLC, on brief), for appellee. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. Big Lots Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company (collectively “employer”) appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“commission”) awarding Howard Clute (“claimant”) a medical award for a right knee injury. On appeal, employer argues the commission erred in determining claimant’s benefits for the right knee injury was not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinions and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its opinions. See Clute v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., JCN VA00000420654 (June 5, 2014 and Jan. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. UNPUBLISHED
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.